Designing Flexible Automated Savings Rules

Automated savings features help users build better money habits by transferring small amounts into savings based on rules or behaviors. But most systems feel static—“save $10 every week”—with no adaptation to income, spending, or goals. A smarter, more flexible automation system could transform how users build financial security passively.

Users often abandon automated savings tools because they feel too rigid or disconnected from their real-world finances. The challenge is to design a rule-based savings system that adapts to user context—income patterns, spending habits, or moods—and feels empowering rather than restrictive.

Users cancel rules when they feel financial pressure

Static schedules don't reflect changing cash flow

Lack of visibility into progress leads to disengagement

Individuals trying to save without thinking about it

People with irregular or freelance income

Users working toward short- and long-term financial goals

Design evaluation checklist

Consider the following factors to ensure a well-rounded, user-centered, and business-aligned solution

User Experience & Usability

Is the solution intuitive and easy to navigate?
Does it minimize friction and enhance efficiency for users?
Are accessibility best practices considered

Problem-Solving & Critical Thinking

Does the solution effectively address the core problem?
Is there a clear rationale behind design decisions?
Has the user’s pain points been mitigated or eliminated?

Business Alignment & Feasibility

How well does the solution balance user needs with business goals?
Is the proposed solution scalable and adaptable?
Are there measurable benefits, such as increased engagement, conversions, or retention?

Visual & Interaction Design

Does the interface follow modern design principles and maintain a visually appealing layout?
Are interactions smooth, meaningful, and engaging?
Is the visual hierarchy clear, guiding users effectively through the experience?

Innovation & Creativity

Does the solution introduce a novel approach to solving the problem?
How does it differentiate from existing solutions in the market?
Are emerging technologies or design trends leveraged appropriately?

Clarity & Presentation

Are the design decisions well-documented and articulated?
Does the submission include annotations or explanations where necessary?
Is the submission structured in a way that makes it easy to evaluate?

Deliverables

1. User Flow or Journey Map

A high-level representation of the steps a user takes to accomplish the task.

2. Wireframes or UI Mockups

Low or high-fidelity visuals showcasing the proposed solution.
Responsive design considerations (if applicable).

3. Prototype (Optional)

An interactive version of the design using Figma, Adobe XD, or similar tools.

4. Design Rationale & Case Study

A brief document explaining the thought process, decisions, and trade-offs made during the design process.
Insights on how the design meets both user needs and business objectives.

5. Accessibility Considerations

Annotations on how the solution accounts for inclusivity and usability best practices.

6. Impact Metrics & Success Measurement

Hypothetical or real-world metrics that would measure the effectiveness of the solution.
Suggested ways to test and iterate on the design.

Challenge details

Difficulty

Intermediate

Estimated time

2 - 3 days

Skills

Access Control, Accessibility, Admin UX, AI and Machine Learning UX, AI Automation, AI Chatbot Development, AI Content Assistance, AI Explainability, AI Personalization, AI Prioritization

Share this brief

About Nordbriefs

Nordbrief is a collection of structured skill building challenges crafted to help product designers refine their strategic thinking, user empathy, and data driven decisions while creating portfolio-worthy projects

Download this brief as PDF